HCI_header.jpg

Using HCI methods to evaluate the effectiveness of LinkedIn as a job search tool for creative graduates.


The challenge

We are introduced to a range of HCI methods for research and evaluation including: surveys, focus group, user testing, heuristic evaluation, card sorting, contextual inquiry, and asked to apply appropriate methods to: “Create an evaluation of LinkedIn that can be used towards improving service for new creative graduates.”


Project story

We (a team of 3) designed 3 studies, each informing the problem statement of the next, to gather findings from high-level perceptions to those centered around accomplishing a specific task. Referring to Jacob Nielsens 10 heuristics, a heuristic evaluation was initially conducted to familiarize ourselves with LinkedIn’s web and mobile sites.

STUDY 1

We started out with a survey questionnaire to get an overview of students’ use of LinkedIn. Results led us to focus on job search, a high priority activity for soon-to-be graduates, and informed the problem statement for our next phase.

STUDY 2

How effective is LinkedIn as a job search tool for new creative graduates?

For this study, a semi-structured, contextual interview protocol was designed for use in an atypical setting (our makeshift usability lab).  Participants searched for a job and talked aloud through their experience, citing problems with  advance search, finding entry-level jobs and saved jobs.

STUDY 3

“How usable advanced search?”
“How effective is entry-level job search?’ 
“How usable is the save job-post function?”

We designed a detailed task analysis which addressed the three problem statements. On completion of the tasks, user paths were created for each participant, highlighting problem areas. 

Reporting findings

Common issues were collated and reported as findings, described in an easy-to-scan format. Recommendations include usability improvements such as making the advance search link more visible, to creating a new experience: "Provide a special job search section for recent graduates to help them maximize their profile and job search efforts".

“You know (LinkedIn) always requires you to fill in your basic information, but some information you share here may be the same as you bank, security information.” (Mark, 22)

“You know (LinkedIn) always requires you to fill in your basic information, but some information you share here may be the same as you bank, security information.” (Mark, 22)

All participants were frustrated trying to specify a location. Advanced search offers location search by zip code but not by city - participants did not know the zip code of city they wanted to work in..

All participants were frustrated trying to specify a location. Advanced search offers location search by zip code but not by city - participants did not know the zip code of city they wanted to work in..

Makeshift lab 

Makeshift lab 

Reporting findings for STUDY 2 (Click to enlarge)


Skills & learnings

 

Key learnings

  • Our 3 tiered research design worked well to hone down to specific usability issues for new graduates using LinkedIn. However, we could have expanded the conclusion to discuss implications for the recommended changes.
  • We recruited only 4 participants for each study whereas NN Group states 5 is the minimum, with 15 as the amount needed to uncover all the usability issues.

My contribution

Project planning, management, recruitment and interview guides were very much a collaborative effort. We took turns to lead the interview, take notes as observer, or organize filming and recording. Additionally I looked after visual communication and report structure.

pie1.jpg